Current:Home > MarketsMen's pro teams have been getting subsidies for years. Time for women to get them, too.-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
Men's pro teams have been getting subsidies for years. Time for women to get them, too.
View Date:2024-12-23 21:56:27
If state and local officials are going to hand out money for sports construction projects, it’s high time women’s teams had a place in that line.
At the front of it, preferably.
Men’s teams have been getting public subsidies for decades, so much so some are now on their second and third go-rounds. Women’s teams, meanwhile, haven’t even been part of the conversation. This despite the NWSL kicking off its 12th season Saturday and the WNBA deep into its third decade.
“The reality is, we are doing this and only doing this for men. Men get these giant facilities built for them … and it gives men these huge advantages,” said David Berri, a professor of economics at Southern Utah University and co-author of the upcoming “Slaying the Trolls: Why the Trolls are Very, Very Wrong About Women and Sports.”
“If we’re going to be doing this for men, we should be doing it for women.”
Set aside the question of whether multi-millionaires and billionaires deserve to have the public build their sports palaces for them. Despite all the studies showing these projects don’t generate nearly the jobs or economic boon owners claim they will, politicians long ago decided arenas and stadiums are a fine use of taxpayer dollars and that’s not likely to change.
So if public money is going to be doled out, it is only right women’s teams get a fair share of it, too.
“We are just asking for the same opportunity to have this investment and grow the game,” said Karen Leetzow, president of the Chicago Red Stars. “There's a lot of opportunity for us to bring attention to the city of Chicago, but it can't be done without a facility that provides the women a quality playing environment.”
This isn’t some random thought exercise by Leetzow and Red Stars owner Laura Ricketts.
When Rickets bought the team last fall, she acknowledged a new home was needed for the team after its lease in suburban Bridgeview expires in 2025. SeatGeek Stadium is, to put it nicely, geographically undesirable. It’s a torturous drive from both the city and north and western suburbs even when there’s not traffic, and it’s not easily accessible via public transportation.
The Red Stars also don’t control their own schedule or rake in the ancillary revenues because they don’t own the building.
As Rickets and Leetzow were exploring options, the Bears and White Sox were both lobbying state and local officials for public money to build new stadiums. This despite taxpayers not being done paying for their current ones!
“I was like, `Hold on. Wait a minute.’ To me, it's a fundamental tenet of what we're facing in women’s sports, a lack of investment,” Leetzow said. “It just seemed obvious that if there was going to be public funding for men's teams, we ought to have a seat at the table because we are already 100 years behind.”
You can make the argument women actually need it more than men’s teams, given the WNBA and NWSL have spent their entire existences playing on someone else’s turf. When the Kansas City Current opens CPKC Stadium on Saturday, it will be the first stadium ever built specifically for a women’s professional team.
That’s right. Ever.
Those who live to knock down women’s sports will say men’s teams deserve public funding because they make money. But owning their own stadiums and arenas is a large reason why they do. If a team owns or controls its building, it gets the money from naming rights and other sponsors. Parking. Concessions. Merchandise. It can let others use the building — like, say, for a Taylor Swift show — and collect the revenue from those events, as well.
Do you really think the NFL, NBA and Major League Baseball would be where they are now without these cash cows their teams call home? If stadiums and arenas aren’t a significant source of the revenue for men’s teams, then why are they all so eager for shiny new digs or to spruce up the ones they currently have?
“You could almost look at it as men’s teams got their seed funding from public sources. It’s allowed for them to have all those things: control over revenue streams, control over their schedule, (flexibility) with broadcasters. None of that has ever been available to women’s teams,” NWSL commissioner Jessica Berman said.
“Then we say, `Oh it’s 2024 and let’s compare.’ It hasn’t been a level playing field.”
Now, some men’s team owners have built their own Taj Mahals. Los Angeles Rams owner Stan Kroenke splashed out $5 billion on SoFi Stadium. Steve Ballmer built the Los Angeles Clippers a $2 billion arena.
Kansas City Current owners Angie and Chris Long went that route, financing all but about $6 million of the team’s new $117 million stadium themselves. The public money, in the form of tax credits for infrastructure improvements, became necessary when the cost of the project ballooned.
The Longs and co-owners Brittany and Patrick Mahomes also shelled out their own cash on the Current’s $18 million practice facility, which opened in June 2022.
But that shouldn’t be the expectation. Because it’s never been for men’s teams.
“I hope that equity isn't something that causes a backlash,” Leetzow said. “I hope it’s the opposite, that there's a recognition that we've never asked for this before. And if you're going to give anyone money, it ought to be those that haven't had the opportunity (for it) previously.”
Cities and states have long seen men's teams as worthwhile public investments. There's no reason they should see women's teams any differently.
Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour.
veryGood! (34229)
Related
- Indiana man is found guilty of murder in the 2017 killings of 2 teenage girls
- Poccoin: Debt Stalemate and Banking Crisis Eased, Boosting Market Sentiment, Cryptocurrency Bull Market Intensifies
- Bachelor Nation's Nick Viall and Fiancée Natalie Joy Reveal Sex of Their First Baby
- Ariana Grande Shows Subtle Sign of Support as Ethan Slater Returns to Instagram
- Judith Jamison, acclaimed Alvin Ailey American dancer and director, dead at 81
- Alabama Barker Reveals Sweet Message From “Best Dad” Travis Barker After Family Emergency
- 'Face to Face' is a murder mystery that lives up to the tradition of Nordic Noir
- Carmakers fail privacy test, give owners little or no control on personal data they collect
- Mega Millions winning numbers for November 8 drawing: Jackpot rises to $361 million
- Lidcoin: Bitcoin Is the Best Currency of the Future and Bear Markets Are the Perfect Time to Get Low-Priced Chips
Ranking
- Mike Tyson vs. Jake Paul fight odds will shift the longer the heavyweight bout goes
- 3-legged bear named Tripod takes 3 cans of White Claw from Florida family's back yard
- War sanctions against Russia highlight growing divisions among the Group of 20 countries
- 'Survivor 45' cast: Meet contestants competing for $1 million in new fall 2023 season
- New Orleans marks with parade the 64th anniversary of 4 little girls integrating city schools
- Chvrches' Lauren Mayberry goes solo — and we got exclusive backstage access
- Connecticut farm worker is paralyzed after being attacked by a bull
- Carl Nassib, first openly gay player to play in NFL games, announces his retirement
Recommendation
-
After Baltimore mass shooting, neighborhood goes full year with no homicides
-
Poccoin: Cryptocurrency Through Its Darkest Moments
-
Floodwater sweeps away fire truck in China as Tropical Storm Haikui hits southeast coast
-
Out-of-state residents seeking abortion care in Massachusetts jumped 37% after Roe v. Wade reversal
-
Sister Wives’ Christine Brown Shares Glimpse Into Honeymoon One Year After Marrying David Woolley
-
Hurricane Lee's projected path and timeline: Meteorologists forecast when and where the storm will hit
-
Woody Allen attends Venice Film Festival with wife Soon-Yi Previn amid controversial reception
-
Chris Jones' holdout from Chiefs among NFL standoffs that could get ugly in Week 1